- Design
- PRISMA-compliant systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials, searched to October 2025, GRADE/CINeMA appraisal
- Population
- 158 randomised controlled trials, 18,794 adults undergoing surgery
- Primary outcome
- incidence of chronic postsurgical pain beyond three months, and long-term opioid use
- Effect
- CPSP RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80), sustained to 12 months; opioid use RR 0.88 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.28), not significant
This network meta-analysis brought together 158 randomised trials and 18,794 patients to ask whether regional anaesthesia reduces pain persisting beyond three months. Overall it did: risk ratio 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80), with the effect still present at 12 months. The benefit held within specific operations — mastectomy (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.79), thoracotomy (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.96), video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96) and knee arthroplasty (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.97).
The network component answers the question that pairwise analysis cannot. For thoracic surgery, neuraxial techniques outperformed peripheral ones: after thoracotomy, neuraxial RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.83) against peripheral RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.96), and after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, 0.60 (0.45 to 0.80) against 0.77 (0.63 to 0.94). Meta-regression found no effect of surgery type, sex or baseline risk on how well regional anaesthesia worked.
Two caveats belong in the same breath as the headline. Long-term opioid use did not differ (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.28), so this is prevention of pain rather than of dependence. And certainty was graded low for chronic pain and low to very low for the network comparisons — the direction is consistent across a large body of trials, the precise ranking of techniques is not settled. What changes today is the consenting conversation: for mastectomy, thoracic surgery and knee arthroplasty, a block is now defensible as a long-term intervention and not only an analgesic one.
- Raise chronic postsurgical pain explicitly when consenting for mastectomy, thoracotomy, VATS and knee arthroplasty
- Prefer a neuraxial technique over a peripheral one for thoracic surgery where both are feasible and safe
- Do not promise reduced long-term opioid use — that outcome was not significantly different
- Flag the patient's block in the discharge summary so persistent pain at three months can be traced back to technique
- Set up a three-month pain check for these operations if your service has none; the outcome is invisible without one
The statistics, in plain English
A risk ratio of 0.73 with an interval well clear of 1.0 across 158 trials is a consistent effect, but GRADE certainty was low — meaning the true effect could still differ meaningfully from 0.73, usually because the included trials were small, unblinded, or measured chronic pain inconsistently. The opioid result (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.28) crosses 1.0 in both directions, so it is compatible with a real reduction, no change, or an increase: an inconclusive result rather than a negative one. The network comparisons of neuraxial against peripheral are the least certain part of the paper, because fewer trials compared them head to head.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for anaesthesiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free