DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 16 September 2026 edition

Research · 05 of 07

Intraoperative handover was not consistently linked to worse outcomes

Hand over with a structured tool when relief is needed; handovers themselves were not consistently linked to harm.

Design
Systematic review with exploratory random-effects meta-analysis (12 cohorts, 1 RCT)
Population
1,030,883 surgical patients; 16.6% with intraoperative handover
Primary outcome
Postoperative morbidity and mortality
Effect
Composite aOR 1.04 (0.98-1.11), I² 72%

This systematic review included 13 studies (12 retrospective cohorts and one multicentre randomised trial) covering 1,030,883 patients, of whom 16.6% had a handover of anaesthesia care during surgery.

The randomised trial found no effect of handover on 30-day mortality, readmission or complications. An exploratory pooled analysis of seven studies (485,623 patients) found no significant association with composite morbidity and mortality (adjusted OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98-1.11), with high heterogeneity (I² 72%). Sensitivity analyses gave similar results.

Earlier cohort studies raised concern that handovers harm patients, prompting some departments to avoid them at the cost of fatigue. The combined evidence does not show a consistent harm.

Handover quality probably matters more than whether a handover happens, which argues for structured handovers rather than avoiding them.

  • Use a structured handover tool covering airway, lines, drugs given, blood loss and the plan.
  • Do not delay relief of a fatigued anaesthetist to avoid a handover.
  • Hand over at a stable point in the procedure where possible.
  • Audit handover quality, not only handover frequency.

Why it matters

It weakens the case for avoiding handovers, which trades one patient-safety risk for another in fatigue.

Don't overread it

Most studies were retrospective with varied definitions and adjustment, so residual confounding could hide a real effect in some settings.

The statistics, in plain English

An I² of 72% means studies disagreed substantially, so a single pooled odds ratio hides a range of settings. The interval of 0.98 to 1.11 excludes a large harm overall but not a small one.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

airwaymgmtperioperativegeneralanaes

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for anaesthesiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app