- Design
- Retrospective multicentre cohort, competing-risk analysis
- Population
- 151,036 adults having non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia, China
- Primary outcome
- Postoperative pneumonia within 30 days
- Effect
- ≥20% MAP fall: sHR 1.108 (95% CI 1.068–1.149); per episode sHR 1.079 (1.050–1.109)
A retrospective cohort at three Chinese hospitals included 151,036 adults having non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia. Intraoperative hypotension was defined 12 ways across nine thresholds, from absolute mean arterial pressures below 50–70 mmHg to relative falls of 20–50% from baseline. The outcome was pneumonia within 30 days, which occurred in 2.3%.
Relative falls were more consistently associated with pneumonia than absolute thresholds. With hypotension defined as a 20% fall from baseline, its presence was associated with pneumonia (subdistribution HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.07–1.15), and each additional episode added risk (sHR 1.08). Absolute thresholds were not consistently associated after adjustment. Risk rose steeply with the first exposure and then levelled off.
This is observational, and the per-patient effect is modest. But it aligns with the argument for individualised blood pressure targets, especially in patients whose usual pressure is high, for whom a 'normal' MAP of 65 may already be a large fall. It does not show that treating the falls prevents pneumonia.
- Consider setting intraoperative blood pressure targets relative to each patient's own baseline.
- Be particularly alert in hypertensive patients, for whom a fixed MAP threshold may hide a large relative fall.
- Treat repeated dips as well as sustained ones; episode count was linked to risk.
- Keep absolute floors in place as well; this study does not argue for abandoning them.
Why it matters
Many departments still define hypotension by a single fixed number, which may miss the falls that matter.
Don't overread it
Observational — it cannot show that preventing relative falls reduces pneumonia.
The statistics, in plain English
A subdistribution hazard ratio of 1.11 means about an 11% higher rate of pneumonia, accounting for death as a competing outcome. On a 2.3% baseline risk that is a small absolute increase per patient, but across many operations it adds up.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for anaesthesiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free