DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 3 November 2026 edition

Practice changer · 05 of 05

Shorter clear fluid fasts in children: no rise in aspiration across 580,000 patients

Consider a one-hour clear fluid fast for healthy children; aspiration was rare and no more common than with two hours.

Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies
Population
580,197 children under 18 having anaesthesia or sedation
Primary outcome
Pulmonary aspiration
Effect
0.03% in both policies; RR 0.77 (0.40–1.47)

A meta-analysis pooled 33 studies of 580,197 children under 18 having general anaesthesia or sedation, comparing liberal clear fluid fasting (under two hours) with conventional fasting (two hours or more).

Pulmonary aspiration occurred in 0.03% under both policies, about 3 in 10,000 children. In the 14 studies that compared the policies directly (475,399 children), there was no difference in risk (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.47). Vomiting without aspiration was also similar (0.76% vs 0.99%). Certainty was very low, largely because most data are observational and events are rare.

Prolonged clear fluid fasting leaves children thirsty, distressed and sometimes hypoglycaemic or hypovolaemic, and in practice fasts often run far longer than the policy states. Several European paediatric anaesthesia bodies already endorse a one-hour clear fluid fast.

These data add reassurance for units adopting or keeping a shorter clear fluid policy for children, while individual exceptions (delayed gastric emptying, bowel obstruction) still apply.

  • Consider allowing clear fluids up to one hour before anaesthesia in otherwise well children.
  • Encourage children to drink rather than simply permitting it, so fasts do not run long.
  • Keep individual exceptions for delayed gastric emptying or obstruction.
  • Audit actual fasting times, which often exceed the policy.

Why it matters

It reassures units that shorter fasts do not trade comfort for aspiration risk.

Don't overread it

Very low certainty; aspiration is too rare for these data to exclude a small difference.

The statistics, in plain English

A risk ratio of 0.77 with an interval from 0.40 to 1.47 is compatible with anything from 60% fewer to 47% more aspirations. Because the baseline risk is 3 in 10,000, even the upper bound means a very small absolute difference.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

perioperativecardiacanaesregionalanaes

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for anaesthesiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app