DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 5 September 2026 edition

Practice changer · 01 of 06

NOAC monotherapy after TAVI halved leaflet thrombosis without a safety penalty

In TAVI patients aged 65-80, twelve months of NOAC monotherapy cut leaflet thrombosis on CT from 28.6% to 16.2% with no excess bleeding or death, making anticoagulation a defensible option where valve durability is the priority.

ACASA-TAVI randomised 360 patients aged 65-80 undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis at the three Norwegian centres that perform most of the country's procedures. They received twelve months of monotherapy with either a factor Xa inhibitor or aspirin, with co-primary endpoints chosen to test efficacy and safety together.

The efficacy endpoint was hypoattenuated leaflet thickening on blinded core-laboratory 4D cardiac CT at twelve months. It occurred in 27 of 168 patients on NOAC (16.2%) against 48 of 168 on aspirin (28.6%), a risk ratio of 0.55 (95% CI 0.37-0.82, P = .004). The safety composite of VARC-3 bleeding, thromboembolic events and all-cause death was 7.5% against 10.6%, a risk difference of -3.3% (95% CI -9.5% to 2.8%), meeting non-inferiority.

Read the endpoint carefully before changing practice. Leaflet thickening on CT is a marker of valve thrombosis, not a clinical event, and its relationship to long-term durability is still being established. What the trial establishes is that in relatively young, relatively well TAVI patients, anticoagulation can be given without paying for it in bleeding. That makes it a reasonable option to discuss for a patient in whom valve durability matters most, which is precisely the younger cohort TAVI is expanding into.

  • Leaflet thickening 16.2% on NOAC vs 28.6% on aspirin (RR 0.55)
  • Safety composite non-inferior: 7.5% vs 10.6%
  • Endpoint is blinded core-lab CT, not a clinical event
  • Most relevant to the younger TAVI patients in whom durability matters

The statistics, in plain English

The efficacy interval, 0.37 to 0.82, sits entirely below 1.0, so the reduction in leaflet thickening is real. The safety interval, -9.5% to +2.8%, crosses zero, which is what non-inferiority requires: it shows no evidence of harm rather than proof of equivalence, and with 360 patients a modest bleeding excess could still hide inside it. The efficacy endpoint being an imaging finding is the main limit on how far this should be pushed.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

structuralafibacslipidologyinterventionheartfailurehtn

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for cardiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app