- Design
- Prospective single-arm study with invasive exercise haemodynamics
- Population
- 30 adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension, before and after 24 weeks of sotatercept
- Primary outcome
- RV contractility, afterload, RV–PA coupling and right heart strain
- Effect
- Coupling preserved (+0.08, −0.11 to +0.26); RV free-wall strain +6.2% (4.5–7.8)
A prospective study in Circulation (22 September) measured right heart mechanics with simultaneous echocardiography and invasive pressures, at rest and on exercise, before and after 24 weeks of sotatercept in 30 adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Sotatercept lowered pulmonary arterial elastance, the measure of afterload, and right ventricular contractility fell in proportion (correlation r = 0.70), so coupling between the ventricle and the pulmonary circulation was preserved. TAPSE and tricuspid annular velocity fell. Yet free-wall strain rose by about 6 percentage points, fractional area change improved, and right atrial filling and contraction got better at rest and on exercise.
The practical point is for anyone reading serial echoes. On sotatercept, a lower TAPSE may reflect a ventricle that no longer needs to work as hard and has shifted from longitudinal annular motion to free-wall shortening, not a failing ventricle. Judge the right heart on free-wall strain, fractional area change and the clinical picture together.
- A falling TAPSE on sotatercept may reflect lower afterload rather than right ventricular decline.
- Track RV free-wall strain and fractional area change on serial echoes in patients on sotatercept.
- Read right heart indices alongside symptoms, walk distance and natriuretic peptides.
- These are mechanistic data from 30 patients, not outcome evidence.
Why it matters
A familiar echo marker can move in the wrong direction on a drug that is helping, and prompt the wrong conclusion.
Don't overread it
This small uncontrolled study explains physiology; it does not add outcome evidence for sotatercept.
The statistics, in plain English
The coupling ratio changed by +0.08 with an interval from −0.11 to +0.26, which crosses zero — meaning no meaningful change, which is the reassuring result here. With 30 participants and no control group, these are measurements of what changed, not proof of benefit.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for cardiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free