- Design
- Substudy of a multicentre cluster-randomised trial
- Population
- 4,398 adults with suspected MI and no diagnostic ST elevation on admission ECG
- Primary outcome
- Invasive management within 2 hours and adjudicated acute coronary occlusion
- Effect
- Early invasive management 45.4% vs 13.6%; occlusion found within 2 hours 35.1% vs 16.7%
DIFOCCULT-3 was a multicentre cluster-randomised trial in which consecutive adults whose admission ECG showed no diagnostic ST elevation were managed either under the conventional STEMI/NSTEMI framework or under an occlusion-focused approach, which looks for ECG and clinical signs of acute coronary occlusion (OMI) whether or not ST-elevation criteria are met. This substudy compared that approach with the guideline definition of very-high-risk NSTEMI, which is supposed to trigger an immediate invasive strategy.
Among 4,398 patients, very-high-risk criteria picked out few people and were inconsistently acted on. The occlusion-focused approach sent 45.4% to invasive management within two hours, against 13.6% under the conventional framework, and adjudicated acute coronary occlusion was found within two hours in 35.1% against 16.7%. Angiographic yield did not fall despite the higher referral rate.
This is a process outcome — earlier identification — not a hard-outcome result, and it depended on staff trained in occlusion-pattern ECG reading. It does reinforce that the absence of ST-elevation criteria does not mean the artery is open.
- Do not rule out acute coronary occlusion because the ECG misses ST-elevation thresholds.
- Look for hyperacute T waves, de Winter pattern, posterior involvement and subtle reciprocal depression.
- Treat refractory ischaemic pain, haemodynamic instability or arrhythmia as reasons for immediate angiography.
- Repeat the ECG every 15–30 minutes while symptoms persist.
- Discuss borderline ECGs with the interventional team early rather than waiting for troponin.
Why it matters
The STEMI/NSTEMI split leaves many patients with an occluded artery waiting for angiography they need now.
Don't overread it
Earlier identification of occlusion is a process gain; this substudy does not show fewer deaths or smaller infarcts.
The statistics, in plain English
45.4% versus 13.6% means about three times as many patients went for early angiography under the occlusion approach. Because angiographic yield held up, the extra referrals were not mostly normal arteries.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for cardiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free