- Design
- AHA scientific statement (evidence review)
- Population
- Patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism or peripheral artery disease
- Primary outcome
- Harms of antithrombotic omission, underdosing and non-adherence
- Effect
- Undertreatment linked to more ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, recurrent thrombosis and death
An American Heart Association scientific statement, published in Circulation on 1 October, addresses antithrombotic undertreatment: drugs not prescribed when indicated, doses below what the label supports, non-adherence, and situations that leave patients with subtherapeutic levels. It is a review of evidence and practice, not a new trial.
It identifies the drivers as departure from evidence-based practice, overestimation of bleeding relative to thrombotic risk, and unequal access to care. The consequences it describes are higher rates of ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, recurrent venous thrombosis and death, in atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism and peripheral artery disease. Real-world data show the gaps are widest in socially disadvantaged patients. The proposed answer is structured, multidisciplinary antithrombotic stewardship.
The commonest version in clinic is the direct oral anticoagulant given at a reduced dose without meeting the label's dose-reduction criteria, often out of bleeding worry in an older patient. In India, cost and intermittent supply add non-adherence to the list. Dose-reduction criteria differ by drug, and they are worth checking against the label rather than memory.
- At each review of a patient on a direct oral anticoagulant, check that the dose matches the label's criteria for that drug: age, weight, creatinine clearance and interacting drugs.
- Do not reduce an anticoagulant dose for bleeding worry alone when the patient does not meet reduction criteria; address modifiable bleeding risks instead.
- Ask directly about missed doses and cost; stopping when a strip runs out is common.
- Recalculate creatinine clearance at least yearly, and sooner in older or unwell patients, since the right dose can change in both directions.
- In atrial fibrillation with a stroke-risk indication, record the reason if anticoagulation is not prescribed.
Why it matters
An anticoagulant at the wrong low dose gives the bleeding risk of treatment without its full stroke protection.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for cardiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free