- Design
- International observational registry, 4-year results
- Population
- 500 children under 12 with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (314 White, 186 non-White)
- Primary outcome
- Change in EASI and patient-reported outcomes by skin colour
- Effect
- EASI improvement, non-White: dupilumab 13.6, methotrexate 8.2, ciclosporin 9.2 points
PEDISTAD is an international observational registry of children with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. This analysis compared 314 White and 186 non-White children under 12 on systemic treatment over four years.
Eczema Area and Severity Index scores improved with all three treatments. In non-White children the mean improvement was 13.6 points with dupilumab, 8.2 with methotrexate and 9.2 with ciclosporin; in White children, 14.2, 10.1 and 4.5. Itch and quality of life improved most with dupilumab in both groups, and ciclosporin did least for itch. Exposure-adjusted adverse event rates were lower in non-White children across all three drugs.
The practical point is that response to these drugs did not differ in a way that should change choice by skin colour. The comparison between drugs is observational — children were not randomised and sicker children may have received different drugs — so it does not show dupilumab is superior. In India, cost and access usually decide between dupilumab and methotrexate or ciclosporin more than any of this.
- Choose systemic treatment for childhood eczema on severity, comorbidity and access, not on skin colour.
- Use validated severity scores in darker skin, where erythema is harder to judge, to track response.
- Expect itch to improve less with ciclosporin than with dupilumab.
- Monitor methotrexate and ciclosporin as usual; adverse event rates were not higher in non-White children.
Why it matters
It addresses a concern that trial data from mostly White children may not apply to others.
Don't overread it
Treatment was not randomised; the registry cannot establish one drug as more effective than another.
The statistics, in plain English
These are average point improvements on a severity score, observed in a registry rather than a trial. Differences between the drugs may reflect who received which drug rather than the drugs themselves.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for dermatology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free