DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 7 August 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 05

Finerenone's albuminuria benefit in type 1 diabetes is independent of HbA1c

Do not defer finerenone in type 1 diabetes with albuminuric CKD while chasing better glycaemic control first; the kidney benefit does not appear to wait for it.

FINE-ONE randomised 242 adults with type 1 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, UACR 200 to <5,000 mg/g and eGFR 25 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m2, to finerenone or placebo. This exploratory analysis asks a question clinicians raise immediately: does the benefit depend on how well the diabetes itself is controlled?

It does not. Median UACR fell from 574.6 to 373.5 mg/g with finerenone against 506.4 to 475.6 mg/g with placebo, a placebo-corrected change of -25% (95% CI -35% to -13%, P = 0.0001). Across HbA1c tertiles (<7.1%, 7.1-8.1%, >8.1%) the placebo-corrected reductions were -17%, -18% and -37%, with P for interaction 0.41. Splitting by diabetes duration gave the same answer, P for interaction 0.70, in a cohort whose mean duration was 32 years.

HbA1c itself was unchanged (between-group difference +0.04%, P = 0.74), which is the point: this is a haemodynamic and anti-fibrotic effect on the kidney, not a glycaemic one. Overall safety and hyperkalaemia incidence were similar across HbA1c tertiles.

Type 1 diabetes has long been the population where cardiorenal trial evidence is thinnest, with practice extrapolated from type 2 cohorts. Evidence generated in type 1 patients specifically is the part that is genuinely new here.

  • 242 adults with type 1 diabetes and albuminuric CKD, 6 months
  • Placebo-corrected UACR -25% (95% CI -35% to -13%, P = 0.0001)
  • Consistent across HbA1c tertiles (P interaction 0.41) and diabetes duration (0.70)
  • HbA1c unchanged, so the benefit is not mediated by glycaemic control
  • Hyperkalaemia incidence similar across HbA1c strata

The statistics, in plain English

"P for interaction 0.41" is the useful number. It tests whether the drug behaves differently in well- versus poorly-controlled patients. A high value means no detectable difference, so the single overall estimate of -25% is a reasonable expectation for any of these patients. The tertile with the largest apparent effect (-37%) is also the smallest subgroup, which is why the interaction test matters more than comparing subgroups by eye.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

type2glp1insulintype1dkdobesitycgm

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for diabetes & endocrinology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app