Today's regulatory sweep found no new emergency drug approval or safety communication with usable clinical detail. That is the usual outcome for this desk: emergency practice is governed far more by college policy and consensus guidance than by regulatory filings, and those documents are published in journals the drug-regulator feeds do not read.
The substantive publication is a two-part multidisciplinary Delphi consensus guideline on unscheduled procedural sedation, published in Annals of Emergency Medicine. Part 1 covers principles and organisation; Part 2 covers clinical practice. Unscheduled sedation — performed in the emergency department, on an unfasted patient, often at short notice — has long borrowed its standards from elective theatre practice, where the patient, the preparation and the staffing are all different. A consensus written for the unscheduled setting is therefore worth reading rather than filing.
One caveat is stated in the document itself: college policy statements are not subject to the same peer review as journal articles. Read them as the considered position of a professional body rather than as primary evidence, and check them against your own institution's governance, which is what will actually be applied if a sedation goes wrong.
- No new emergency drug approval or safety action in today's sweep
- Two-part Delphi consensus on unscheduled procedural sedation
- Written for the unfasted, unscheduled patient rather than elective theatre
- College policy is not peer-reviewed like a journal article; check local governance too
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.
Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for emergency & critical care, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free