- Design
- multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial with 2-by-2 factorial design, up to 28 days of treatment
- Population
- 1,956 critically ill mechanically ventilated patients aged 16 or over with acute respiratory failure and difficult-to-clear secretions
- Primary outcome
- duration of mechanical ventilation from randomisation to first successful unassisted breathing
- Effect
- carbocisteine 186.1 vs 172.7 hours (adjusted HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.05); hypertonic saline 184.5 vs 174.3 hours (adjusted HR 1.00, 0.91-1.10); GI bleeding RR 6.51 (1.47-28.76); nebulisation hypoxaemia RR 13.29 (4.12-42.83)
A multicentre open-label 2-by-2 factorial trial randomised 1,956 mechanically ventilated patients aged 16 or over with acute respiratory failure and difficult-to-clear secretions to enteral carbocisteine 750 mg three times daily, nebulised 6-7% hypertonic saline 4 ml four times daily, both, or usual care alone, for up to 28 days. There was no interaction between the two (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83-1.22).
Neither shortened ventilation. Median duration was 186.1 hours with carbocisteine against 172.7 without (adjusted HR 0.96, 0.87-1.05) and 184.5 hours with hypertonic saline against 174.3 without (adjusted HR 1.00, 0.91-1.10). Both directions of the point estimate favour not giving the drug, though not significantly.
The harms did reach significance. Clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 13 of 965 on carbocisteine against 2 of 966 without (RR 6.51, 1.47-28.76). Hypertonic saline produced bronchoconstriction needing a bronchodilator in 2.4% against 0.4% (RR 5.73, 1.99-16.52) and hypoxaemia during nebulisation in 4.1% against 0.3% (RR 13.29, 4.12-42.83). These are drugs given for secretions that are already a problem, in patients whose oxygenation is already the reason they are ventilated — and the nebulisation itself is desaturating one in twenty-five of them.
- Stop prescribing carbocisteine and nebulised hypertonic saline as routine secretion management in ventilated patients
- Where nebulised hypertonic saline is used for another indication, monitor saturations through the nebulisation, not just before and after
- Review any patient on enteral carbocisteine who develops a fall in haemoglobin or melaena
- Direct the effort to what does clear secretions: positioning, humidification, suction technique and early mobilisation
- These findings concern mucoactives in undifferentiated acute respiratory failure, not nebulised saline in cystic fibrosis or bronchiectasis
Why it matters
Two treatments given by habit for a problem everyone recognises turn out to do nothing for it and to cause something else.
The statistics, in plain English
Both efficacy hazard ratios sit essentially on 1.0 with tight intervals, so this is a definitive null rather than an underpowered one. The harm ratios look enormous (6.51, 13.29) because the comparator rates are tiny — 2 events and 3 events respectively. The absolute figures are the usable ones: about 1 extra gastrointestinal bleed per 85 patients treated with carbocisteine, and about 1 extra desaturation episode per 26 treated with hypertonic saline.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for emergency & critical care, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free