DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 23 September 2026 edition

Clinical update · 01 of 06

VExUS: a reasonable gauge of venous pressure, a weak predictor outside cardiac patients

Treat a VExUS grade of 2 or more as a reason to stop giving fluid, but not as a validated prognostic score in general ICU patients.

Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 32 studies
Population
3,142 cardiac and critically ill patients
Primary outcome
Diagnostic accuracy for raised venous pressure; AKI and mortality
Effect
Cardiac: AKI OR 4.44 (2.34–8.43); ICU: AKI OR 1.45 (0.70–2.99)

A systematic review and meta-analysis in Critical Care Medicine (published 9 June) gathered 32 studies with 3,142 patients on the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score, which grades congestion from the IVC and hepatic, portal and intrarenal venous Doppler.

Diagnostic studies, too varied to pool, suggested sensitivity of 78–95% and specificity of 80–90% for raised central venous or right atrial pressure. In cardiac patients, a grade of 2 or more was associated with acute kidney injury (OR 4.44, 95% CI 2.34–8.43, moderate certainty) and death (OR 3.17, 1.30–7.75, low certainty). In general critically ill patients there was no clear association with AKI (OR 1.45, 0.70–2.99) or death (OR 1.25, 0.77–2.03).

VExUS is a useful bedside signal that the venous side is congested — a reason to stop giving fluid and consider decongestion. It is not yet a validated prognostic tool for the mixed ICU population, and treating to a VExUS grade has not been tested in trials.

  • Use VExUS to add venous information to the fluid decision, not to replace clinical assessment
  • A grade of 2 or 3 is a reason to pause further fluid
  • Interpret portal pulsatility with caution in cirrhosis and in thin patients
  • Repeat after decongestion to see whether the grade falls

Why it matters

It sets limits on a tool many emergency physicians and intensivists have adopted quickly.

Don't overread it

No trial has shown that managing to a VExUS grade improves outcomes.

The statistics, in plain English

An odds ratio of 4.44 in cardiac patients is a strong association, with an interval well above 1. In general critically ill patients the intervals cross 1, so no association was shown. Certainty was mostly low because studies were small and varied.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

ventilationsepsisshockarrestedops

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for emergency & critical care, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app