DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 4 October 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 05

Which screen-positive youth are at highest suicide risk?

After a positive adolescent suicide screen, let a recent attempt, past self-injury, prior psychiatric admission and hopelessness weight towards more intensive assessment and follow-up.

Design
Secondary analysis of a prospective multicentre ED cohort
Population
2,085 adolescents aged 12 to 17 with a positive suicide screen
Primary outcome
Suicide attempt and mental-health revisit within three months
Effect
11.6% attempted; recent attempt adjusted odds ratio 2.52 (95% CI 1.84-3.45)

A positive suicide screen in the emergency department raises the question of who needs the most intensive response. This secondary analysis of a research-network cohort followed 2,085 adolescents aged 12 to 17 with a positive Ask Suicide-Screening Questions result.

The outcomes were sobering: 11.6% attempted suicide and 19.9% had a mental-health-related revisit or hospitalisation within three months. Four factors marked higher risk of a subsequent attempt: a suicide attempt in the past month (adjusted odds ratio 2.52), past non-suicidal self-injury (2.06), prior mental-health hospitalisation (1.39) and hopelessness (1.30). Similar factors predicted revisit or hospitalisation.

The practical use is in disposition. After a positive screen, a recent attempt, past self-injury, prior psychiatric admission or expressed hopelessness should weigh towards more intensive assessment and follow-up, rather than treating all screen-positive adolescents identically.

  • Cohort of 2,085 adolescents aged 12 to 17 with a positive ED suicide screen.
  • 11.6% attempted suicide and 19.9% had a mental-health revisit or admission within three months.
  • A suicide attempt in the past month carried the highest risk (adjusted odds ratio 2.52).
  • Past non-suicidal self-injury (2.06) and hopelessness (1.30) also marked higher risk.
  • Use these factors to weight disposition after a positive screen.

Why it matters

It helps separate the screen-positive adolescents who most need intensive follow-up from those at lower short-term risk.

Don't overread it

These are risk associations, not a validated prediction tool; the absence of a listed factor does not make a screen-positive adolescent safe.

The statistics, in plain English

An adjusted odds ratio of 2.52 means roughly 2.5 times the odds of a subsequent attempt, but with 11.6% attempting overall, even lower-risk screen-positive youth have a substantial absolute risk. The factors sharpen, rather than replace, clinical judgement.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

paedemergencyairwayedopssepsisshockventilation

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for emergency & critical care, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app