- Design
- Prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial
- Population
- 120 mechanically ventilated ICU adults on opioid analgosedation (59 ketamine, 61 placebo)
- Primary outcome
- Hourly opioid dose (fentanyl equivalents)
- Effect
- 64 vs 77 micrograms/hr; median difference -13 (95% CrI -26.6 to 2.4); 95% probability of benefit
A double-blind randomised trial at two Australian ICUs assigned 120 mechanically ventilated adults already receiving an opioid infusion to add a low-dose ketamine infusion (0.15 mg/kg/hr) or placebo, with the hourly opioid dose as the primary outcome.
Hourly opioid use (fentanyl equivalents) was lower with ketamine, 64 versus 77 micrograms per hour, a median difference of -13 (95% credible interval -26.6 to 2.4; 95% probability of benefit). There was no difference in delirium or most secondary outcomes, and no excess of significant adverse events.
The finding supports low-dose ketamine as a reasonable opioid-sparing adjunct in ventilated patients who need escalating opioid analgosedation, with a reassuring safety profile. The effect is modest, the trial small, and patient-centred outcomes such as ventilator-free days were not improved, so it is an option to consider rather than a new standard.
- Adding low-dose ketamine lowered hourly opioid use from 77 to 64 micrograms per hour (fentanyl equivalents).
- The probability of an opioid-sparing benefit was 95%, though the interval crossed zero.
- Delirium and most secondary outcomes did not differ between groups.
- No excess of significant adverse events was seen.
- Consider it an opioid-sparing adjunct, not a replacement for standard analgosedation.
Why it matters
It offers a way to limit opioid exposure during ventilation without evident added harm.
Don't overread it
Small, two-centre trial; it shows opioid sparing, not improvement in ventilator-free days or other patient-centred outcomes.
The statistics, in plain English
The 95% credible interval crosses zero, so the opioid-sparing effect, while probable (95% probability of benefit), is not definitive; a small single result like this is hypothesis-supporting, not practice-defining.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for emergency & critical care, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free