- Design
- Post hoc pooled analysis of three prospective observational studies
- Population
- 3,848 ventilated adults without ARDS at start (1,702 neurocritical)
- Primary outcome
- Development of ARDS after start of invasive ventilation
- Effect
- ARDS 8.7% vs 3.9% in neurocritical vs other patients
PRIME pools individual data from three prospective observational studies of ventilation in critically ill adults without ARDS at the start of ventilation. This analysis compared 1,702 neurocritical care patients with 1,920 others.
Neurocritical patients received lower tidal volumes, PEEP and oxygen, with lower driving pressure and mechanical power and better compliance. Yet ARDS was diagnosed more often in them (8.7% vs 3.9%), while ICU mortality was lower (14.3% vs 22.8%). Among neurocritical patients, tidal volume per kilogram of predicted body weight was independently associated with developing ARDS, and those who did had higher driving pressure and mechanical power.
The reasons are likely multiple — aspiration, neurogenic lung injury and the competing priority of carbon dioxide control. The observational design cannot say whether lower tidal volumes would prevent it, but it supports applying lung-protective principles in brain injury rather than treating the lungs as an afterthought.
- Set tidal volume by predicted body weight in brain-injured patients, as in other ventilated patients.
- Watch driving pressure as well as tidal volume.
- Expect ARDS to develop during ventilation in brain injury; reassess oxygenation daily.
- Balance carbon dioxide targets against lung protection explicitly in the plan.
Why it matters
Neurocritical patients are often ventilated for the brain alone, but their lungs appear more vulnerable, not less.
Don't overread it
This is observational; it cannot show that a given tidal volume caused ARDS.
The statistics, in plain English
Comparing groups in an observational database shows differences, not causes. Lower mortality in neurocritical patients alongside more ARDS suggests the groups differ in many ways beyond ventilation.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for emergency & critical care, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free