DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 8 October 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 05

A timed corridor walk was the practical way to measure walking speed in a diabetes clinic

Consider a timed corridor walk at diabetes reviews as a quick functional measure, recognising its effect on outcomes is untested.

Design
Feasibility study in one general practice
Population
30 mobile adults attending a UK general practice diabetes clinic
Primary outcome
Feasibility and agreement of three walking speed methods
Effect
Timed walk 1.12 m/s vs accelerometer 1.15 and treadmill 1.01; recruitment 91%

Usual walking speed predicts cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes but is rarely measured in general practice. This feasibility study in a UK general practice diabetes clinic asked consecutive mobile patients to do a timed 28-metre walk in the surgery corridor while wearing an accelerometer, then a three-minute treadmill walk, repeated at six months.

Thirty of 33 patients agreed (91%), and 25 repeated testing at six months. Average speed was similar across methods: 1.12 m/s on the timed walk, 1.15 by accelerometer and 1.01 on the treadmill. Repeat tests agreed well, but limits of agreement between the corridor walk and the treadmill were wide. Patients and staff found all tests acceptable, but the treadmill took longest.

A corridor walk adds a minute or two to a diabetes review and gives a simple functional measure. This study shows it can be done; it does not show that measuring it changes outcomes.

  • Consider timing a usual-pace corridor walk at the annual diabetes review.
  • Use the same distance and instructions each time so results are comparable.
  • Treat a slow walking speed as a prompt to review cardiovascular risk and physical activity.
  • Skip treadmill testing in primary care; it took longest and added little.

Why it matters

Walking speed is a cheap risk marker that primary care almost never records.

Don't overread it

Thirty patients in one practice; this tests feasibility, not clinical benefit.

The statistics, in plain English

Bland-Altman limits of agreement show how far two methods can differ for one person. Good average agreement with wide limits means the methods give similar group results but may disagree noticeably for an individual.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

screeningcommoninfectionchronicdisease

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for family medicine, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app