- Design
- Quasi-experimental before-and-after study with interrupted time series
- Population
- Patients of two public primary care units in Finland over 48 months
- Primary outcome
- Continuity indices (own patient ratio, SLICC, usual provider of care)
- Effect
- Own patient ratio 0.88 vs 0.40; SLICC 0.31 vs 0.16; UPC 0.35 in the stronger unit
Two Finnish primary care units assigned every patient a named GP for non-urgent care. The researchers tracked four years of consultations to see whether patients actually saw that doctor.
In one unit, the model became routine and most visits were with the named GP. In the other, it remained largely a label, and continuity with other doctors rose instead.
The authors link the difference to sustained GP presence and alignment of the organisation around the model. Continuity is consistently associated with better outcomes, but it has to be built into rotas and booking.
- In the successful unit, 88% of visits were with the named GP.
- In the other unit, only 40% were, despite the same policy.
- Overall continuity indices improved in both but stayed modest.
- The authors attribute the gap to sustained GP presence and organisational alignment.
- Measure the share of visits with the patient's own doctor to see whether a scheme is real.
Why it matters
Continuity schemes are often launched on paper; this shows that without organisational change, the label changes and the care does not.
Don't overread it
Two units in one country, compared before and after, cannot show which organisational factor mattered most.
The statistics, in plain English
The own patient ratio is the share of visits with the named GP. Continuity indices run from 0 to 1, so 0.31 to 0.35 is modest even in the better unit.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for family medicine, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free