DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 21 October 2026 edition

Clinical update · 01 of 05

A multi-target blood test detected three times more early HCC than ultrasound, with more false positives

A multi-target blood test detected far more early HCC than ultrasound but with many more false positives; ultrasound remains standard for now.

Design
Prospective multicentre paired diagnostic study
Population
2,293 adults with cirrhosis or chronic HBV under HCC surveillance
Primary outcome
Early-stage HCC sensitivity and test specificity
Effect
Sensitivity 66.7% vs 22.2% (ultrasound); specificity 81.8% vs 98.6%

ALTUS, a prospective multicentre US study in the Journal of Hepatology, compared a multi-target HCC blood test with surveillance ultrasound in adults with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B, using CT or MRI in everyone as the reference.

Of 2,293 participants with paired results, 37 had HCC, 27 at early stage. The blood test detected 66.7% of early-stage cancers and ultrasound 22.2%, a paired difference of 44.4 points. Specificity was 81.8% for the blood test, just below the prespecified 82% target, against 98.6% for ultrasound.

Ultrasound surveillance misses many early cancers, especially in patients with obesity or steatotic liver disease, and adherence is poor. A blood test could catch more cancers and be easier to repeat. But a specificity near 82% means roughly one in five patients without cancer would be recalled for imaging at each round.

The number of cancers was small, so sensitivity estimates are imprecise. This is a promising test, not yet a replacement for ultrasound surveillance.

  • Continue six-monthly ultrasound, with or without AFP, as standard HCC surveillance
  • Note that ultrasound missed most early cancers in this study, particularly relevant in obese patients
  • Expect about one in five false positives per round if a blood test like this is used
  • Plan imaging capacity before adopting any blood-based surveillance test

Why it matters

Ultrasound's poor sensitivity for early HCC is now quantified against a practical alternative.

Don't overread it

Only 27 early cancers, and the test missed its specificity target; it is not ready to replace ultrasound.

The statistics, in plain English

With only 27 early cancers, the blood test's sensitivity interval runs from 47.8% to 81.4%. Specificity of 81.8% versus 98.6% means about 18 false alarms per 100 people screened, against fewer than 2 with ultrasound.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

cirrhosisgicancermasldviralhep

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for gastroenterology & hepatology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app