DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 30 October 2026 edition

Practice changer · 06 of 06

Inject trial: high-volume injections for Achilles tendinopathy no better than sham at a year

Do not use high-volume injections routinely for midportion Achilles tendinopathy; keep exercise-based rehabilitation as the treatment.

Design
Single-centre, participant- and assessor-masked, three-arm randomised trial
Population
192 adults with midportion Achilles tendinopathy
Primary outcome
VISA-A pain and disability at 12 months
Effect
Steroid vs sham -3.5 (98.3% CI -12.0 to 5.0); no steroid vs sham 4.0 (-4.2 to 12.3)

The Inject trial, published in the BMJ on 28 October 2026, randomised 192 adults with midportion Achilles tendinopathy in one Australian community centre to sham injection, high-volume injection of saline and local anaesthetic, or the same with 25 mg hydrocortisone. Everyone received the same exercise programme and advice, and participants and assessors were masked.

At 12 months there was no clear difference in VISA-A pain and disability between sham and either injection. The steroid injection helped at six weeks (9.2 points better than sham), but at 26 weeks it did worse than the steroid-free injection (-8.6 points). A cost analysis favoured the steroid injection, but the authors judged that the longer-term clinical picture does not support routine use.

For anyone who sees tendon pain, the message is that injections do not replace loading exercise, and a short-term steroid gain may cost later recovery.

  • Make progressive loading exercise the first treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy.
  • Avoid routine high-volume injections, with or without steroid, for this condition.
  • If a patient asks for an injection for quick relief, explain the early gain was offset by worse outcomes at six months.
  • Set expectations that recovery takes months, not weeks.

Why it matters

A quick steroid benefit that turns into worse recovery later is exactly the trade patients are not usually told about.

Don't overread it

A single-centre trial of 192 people; it tested high-volume injection, not every injection technique.

The statistics, in plain English

The trial used 98.3% confidence intervals to allow for three comparisons. All 12-month intervals crossed zero, so no injection clearly beat sham. The six-week and 26-week differences were secondary and should be read as signals.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

practicechangingguidelinesdrugsafetypublichealth

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for top clinical updates, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app