- Design
- Cochrane systematic review of 24 double-blind randomised trials
- Population
- 45,660 peri- and postmenopausal women, mostly over 60
- Primary outcome
- Long-term mortality, cardiovascular, cancer and fracture outcomes
- Effect
- Combined: breast cancer RR 1.27 (1.03–1.56); oestrogen-only: stroke RR 1.33 (1.06–1.67); fractures RR 0.73–0.78
This updated Cochrane review included 24 double-blind randomised trials with 45,660 women taking hormone therapy or placebo for at least a year. About 70% of the data came from the Women's Health Initiative and HERS; most women were over 60 with comorbidities.
In the Women's Health Initiative combined oestrogen–progestogen trial (16,608 women, 5.6 years), therapy probably made little difference to coronary events (RR 1.17), may have increased stroke (RR 1.39) and venous thromboembolism (RR 2.03), probably increased breast cancer (RR 1.27) and probably reduced all clinical fractures (RR 0.78). In the oestrogen-only trial (10,739 women after hysterectomy, 7 years), therapy probably increased stroke (RR 1.33) and gallbladder surgery (RR 1.78), probably made little difference to coronary events and breast cancer, and reduced fractures (RR 0.73).
For geriatricians and GPs, this is most relevant to older women still taking hormone therapy started years ago. The findings apply to oral conjugated equine oestrogen started mostly after 60, and may not reflect transdermal preparations or treatment started at menopause.
- Review the indication for hormone therapy in older women at each medication review
- Weigh stroke and thromboembolism risk against symptom benefit in women over 60
- Consider transdermal oestrogen where continuation is chosen and thrombotic risk is a concern
- Do not start hormone therapy in older women for fracture or cardiovascular prevention
Why it matters
Many older women continue hormone therapy started long ago without a review of its changing risk balance.
Don't overread it
Mostly oral conjugated oestrogen started after 60 — the results may not apply to younger women or transdermal therapy.
The statistics, in plain English
Moderate certainty means the true effect is probably close to the estimate. The venous thromboembolism interval for combined therapy is wide (1.55 to 6.64). These are relative risks; absolute risks depend on each woman's baseline, which rises with age.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for geriatrics, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free