- Design
- Randomised controlled trial with wait-list control
- Population
- 198 community-dwelling adults ≥60 years at risk of abuse, Hong Kong
- Primary outcome
- Elder abuse and neglect in the past month
- Effect
- Minor psychological aggression d = 0.92 at 3 months; caregiver neglect d = 0.57 post-intervention
Older people experiencing abuse are often reluctant to seek help. A Hong Kong trial randomised 198 community-dwelling Chinese-speaking adults aged 60 or over at risk of abuse — most of them women — to four individual motivational interviewing sessions or a waiting list.
Compared with controls, the intervention group had greater reductions in minor psychological aggression at three months and in caregiver neglect immediately after the sessions, and larger gains in self-efficacy and social support. Of 359 eligible people, 161 declined to take part.
The trial is small, outcomes were self-reported, and the comparison was a waiting list rather than an active control. But it suggests a structured conversation that respects the older person's ambivalence — rather than pushing for immediate action — can reduce some forms of harm. In India, where abuse is often by family members on whom the person depends, that approach may suit the reality better than referral alone.
- Ask older patients privately and directly about mistreatment, neglect and financial exploitation.
- Expect ambivalence; many will not want to act against a family member immediately.
- Consider a motivational approach that explores the person's own goals rather than insisting on a plan.
- Know the local routes for support and safeguarding before you ask.
Why it matters
Elder abuse is under-detected partly because clinicians do not know what to offer once it is disclosed.
Don't overread it
A small wait-list-controlled trial with self-reported outcomes; effects on serious physical abuse were not shown.
The statistics, in plain English
Cohen's d is a standardised effect size: 0.5 is moderate and 0.8 large. The reduction in minor psychological aggression (d = 0.92) was large, but in a small sample such estimates can be inflated.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for geriatrics, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free