- Design
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 randomised trials (22 in the review)
- Population
- Community-dwelling adults aged 60 or older without cognitive impairment
- Primary outcome
- Executive function: inhibitory control, working memory, cognitive flexibility
- Effect
- Working memory SMD 0.30 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.59); cognitive flexibility SMD -0.50 (-0.88 to -0.12); no difference versus other exercise
This systematic review and meta-analysis searched for randomised trials of resistance exercise in community-dwelling adults aged 60 or older without cognitive impairment. Twenty-two trials met inclusion criteria, and 17 contributed to the meta-analysis. The outcomes were inhibitory control, working memory and cognitive flexibility.
Compared with control conditions, resistance training improved working memory (standardised mean difference 0.30, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.59) and cognitive flexibility (SMD -0.50, -0.88 to -0.12), with no significant effect on inhibitory control. When resistance training was compared with other exercise, there were no significant differences in any domain.
Certainty of evidence was low, and protocols and risk of bias varied. The working memory interval only just excludes zero. Resistance training is worth recommending for strength, function and falls prevention; the cognitive gain is a possible bonus, and the review does not show that it outperforms aerobic or mixed exercise.
- Recommend resistance training to older adults for strength and function first; cognitive benefit is a possible extra.
- Do not promise cognitive gains; the evidence was low certainty.
- Any regular exercise looked similar to resistance training for cognition in head-to-head comparisons.
- Start with supervised, progressive loading and check for cardiovascular and joint problems first.
Why it matters
It shifts the question from whether exercise helps thinking to whether resistance training has any distinct advantage, and the answer so far is that it does not.
Don't overread it
Low-certainty evidence from heterogeneous trials with high risk of bias does not show that resistance training prevents cognitive decline or dementia.
The statistics, in plain English
A standardised mean difference of 0.30 is a small to moderate effect, and its interval (0.02 to 0.59) barely excludes zero. Comparisons with other exercise showed no clear difference, so the effect may be of exercise generally rather than of resistance work specifically.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for geriatrics, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free