- Design
- Prospective community cohort with competing-risk analysis
- Population
- 3,073 community-dwelling adults aged 70–79 (Health ABC)
- Primary outcome
- Persistent lower-extremity mobility limitation over 6 years
- Effect
- Poor appetite adjusted HR 1.44 (95% CI 1.2–1.7); 40% vs 20% limited by 18 months
The Health, Aging and Body Composition study followed 3,073 community-dwelling adults aged 70–79 for up to 6 years. Baseline appetite was recorded as good or poor, along with IL-6, TNF-α and CRP. The outcome was persistent lower-extremity limitation: difficulty walking a quarter mile or climbing 10 steps on two reports six months apart.
Poor appetite was reported by 12.6%. More of them developed mobility limitation (64% vs 47%), and by 18 months 40% had done so against 20% of those with good appetite. After adjustment for disease, mood, medicines and sensory factors, poor appetite carried a hazard ratio of 1.44 (95% CI 1.2–1.7). Raised inflammatory markers were independently associated with risk, and people with both poor appetite and inflammation declined fastest — half within about a year.
This is observational and cannot show that improving appetite prevents decline. But appetite is a simple question, and a positive answer can prompt a nutrition and function review before mobility is lost.
- Ask older patients directly whether their appetite has fallen, and record the answer.
- Review weight, medicines that blunt appetite, oral health, mood and swallowing when appetite is poor.
- Consider early dietetic and physiotherapy input for those reporting poor appetite.
- Look for treatable inflammatory or chronic disease when poor appetite has no clear cause.
Why it matters
A one-word answer about appetite identified people who lost mobility within months.
Don't overread it
Observational — it does not show that treating poor appetite slows functional decline.
The statistics, in plain English
A hazard ratio of 1.44 means mobility limitation developed about 44% faster in people with poor appetite. Because appetite was self-reported once at baseline, and the study is observational, it marks risk rather than proving cause.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for geriatrics, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free