DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 2 September 2026 edition

Clinical update · 01 of 06

Testing everyone for tuberculosis did not beat testing those with symptoms

Universal Xpert Ultra and urine LAM testing of HIV inpatients did not increase confirmed tuberculosis treatment starts or reduce eight-week mortality compared with symptom-triggered testing.

EXULTANT randomised 1,172 adults living with HIV admitted to hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique. The intervention arm received sputum Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and urine lipoarabinomannan testing irrespective of symptoms; the control arm received the same tests when symptoms or WHO criteria indicated them. Median CD4 count was 232 cells per microlitre and three-quarters were already on antiretroviral therapy.

Microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis started within 72 hours in 93 of 582 (16.0%) intervention patients and 90 of 590 (15.3%) controls — a difference of 0.7% with an interval from -3.4 to 4.8. Eight-week all-cause mortality was 25.8% against 28.8%, hazard ratio 0.86, interval 0.69 to 1.07. Median time to starting treatment was under a day in both arms.

The control-arm numbers explain the result. Of the 505 control patients eligible for sputum Xpert on symptoms, only 306 — 60.6% — actually produced a sample. Symptom-triggered testing was already reaching nearly everyone it could, and the missing 39% were missing because they could not expectorate, not because nobody asked. Expanding the eligibility criteria does not fix that. A quarter of these patients died within eight weeks either way.

  • Hospitalised adults with HIV in a high-burden setting — not outpatient or low-burden screening
  • The difference was 0.7%, and the interval spans a 3.4% harm to a 4.8% benefit
  • Only 61% of eligible control patients produced sputum, which is the real constraint
  • Mortality of about 27% at eight weeks in both arms is the number that should disturb
  • A non-sputum diagnostic, not a wider testing rule, is what this points towards

The statistics, in plain English

A difference of 0.7% with an interval from -3.4 to 4.8 means the trial has excluded any large benefit and cannot rule out a small one either way. The mortality hazard ratio of 0.86 crosses 1.0, so no survival benefit was shown — but with 320 deaths this is a reasonably powered null rather than an underpowered one, which makes it more informative than most negative results.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

tbhivtropicalvaccinesamrhai

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for infectious diseases, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app