DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 13 September 2026 edition

Clinical update · 03 of 06

A proposal to replace the binary definition of a sexually transmitted infection with three tiers

Say which kind of transmissibility you mean when you give the diagnosis — the single label carries consequences the evidence does not support.

Whether a condition counts as a sexually transmitted infection decides what enters surveillance, what gets programme funding, and what appears on a screening panel. There is no agreed operational classification linking the working definitions to those decisions, and microbiology, clinical medicine and public health each draw the boundary in a different place.

The authors of this Personal View argue that the contested cases expose the problem: bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, scabies, mpox and sexually transmissible enteric pathogens all sit awkwardly inside a yes-or-no category. They propose three tiers — core sexually transmitted infections, sexually associated infections, and incidental sexually transmissible infections — anchored on four explicit classification dimensions, with conditions able to move between tiers as evidence and local epidemiology change.

They also raise what a formal classification could cost. Naming a condition as sexually transmitted changes how patients are treated by services and by each other, and the equity and stigma consequences fall unevenly. For a clinician the immediate use is in how you explain a diagnosis: bacterial vaginosis is the common example where the label a patient hears determines whether a partner is blamed, and a graded vocabulary is more honest than forcing one.

  • Be precise in the notes about whether an infection is sexually transmitted, sexually associated, or incidentally transmissible
  • Choose the words you use with the patient deliberately — bacterial vaginosis is the recurring example
  • Check what your local screening panel actually covers, which is a programme decision rather than a clinical one
  • Expect surveillance definitions to lag any change in classification
  • Note this is a proposal under discussion, not a standard anyone is currently applying

Why it matters

The category boundary, not the clinical need, currently decides what gets tested for and funded.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

vaccinesoutbreaksepsis

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for infectious diseases, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app