- Design
- Pilot, multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial
- Population
- 50 women with recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infection
- Primary outcome
- At least one microbiological recurrence over 26 weeks
- Effect
- 16.7% vs 42.3%; RR 0.39 (95% CI 0.14-1.14)
This pilot double-blind trial randomised 50 women with recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infection to the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 or placebo for 26 weeks. Recruitment fell short during the COVID-19 pandemic.
At least one culture-confirmed recurrence occurred in 4 of 24 (16.7%) on the probiotic and 11 of 26 (42.3%) on placebo (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.14). Mild gastrointestinal upset was the main side effect.
The direction is encouraging for a non-antibiotic option, but the result is not statistically significant and the trial was too small to settle the question.
- Do not recommend this probiotic for recurrent urinary infection on the basis of this pilot.
- Use established measures first: hydration advice, review of spermicide use, vaginal oestrogen after menopause.
- Confirm recurrences with culture before long-term prophylaxis.
- Discuss non-antibiotic prophylaxis options where evidence supports them, to limit resistance.
Why it matters
A non-antibiotic route to prevention is worth a proper trial in an era of rising resistance.
The statistics, in plain English
A relative risk of 0.39 suggests recurrences might be roughly halved, but the confidence interval runs from 0.14 to 1.14, which includes no effect. With 50 women, a chance result is entirely possible.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for infectious diseases, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free