- Design
- Cluster-randomised controlled trial
- Population
- 44 villages and neighbourhoods in Burkina Faso and DR Congo; about 10,400 patients surveyed
- Primary outcome
- Change in Watch-group antibiotic use
- Effect
- 26.8%→17.1% vs 13.4%→21.2%; adjusted prevalence ratio 0.33 (0.14–0.78)
CABU-EICO, a cluster-randomised trial in The Lancet Infectious Diseases, randomised 44 villages and neighbourhoods in Nanoro, Burkina Faso, and Kimpese, DR Congo. Intervention areas received nine months of community health education plus training and feedback for every local medicine dispenser — health centres, private clinics, pharmacies and informal vendors — using WHO AWaRe guidance.
In about 5,500 patients surveyed before and 4,900 after, Watch-group antibiotic use fell from 26.8% to 17.1% in intervention areas and rose from 13.4% to 21.2% in control areas, an adjusted prevalence ratio of 0.33. Simulated-patient visits showed no worsening in how common infections were managed.
In many low- and middle-income settings, including much of India, most antibiotics are dispensed outside hospitals, by pharmacies and informal providers. Stewardship confined to hospitals misses them. This trial suggests that reaching every dispenser, and the community, can shift prescribing within months.
For clinicians who run or advise on stewardship, the lesson is to extend training to pharmacies and community providers, not just doctors, and to use a simple shared framework such as AWaRe.
- Include pharmacists and community dispensers in antibiotic stewardship training, not only doctors
- Use WHO AWaRe as a shared language across providers
- Pair provider training with community messages about when antibiotics are not needed
- Give providers feedback on their own antibiotic use
Why it matters
Antibiotic resistance is driven where most antibiotics are dispensed, which is outside hospitals.
Don't overread it
Antibiotic use, not resistance or clinical outcomes, was measured, over nine months in two districts.
The statistics, in plain English
A prevalence ratio of 0.33 means Watch antibiotic use was about a third of what it would have been without the intervention. The interval (0.14 to 0.78) is wide because the unit of randomisation was the village, and there were only 44.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for infectious diseases, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free