DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 27 October 2026 edition

Practice changer · 06 of 06

Skull-base surgery: meningitis 1.2% with one-day prophylaxis, 2.1% with longer courses

Consider stopping skull-base surgical prophylaxis at about 24 hours; longer courses showed no added protection.

Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 observational studies
Population
7,981 patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull-base surgery
Primary outcome
Postoperative meningitis by prophylaxis duration
Effect
1.24% (≤1 day), 1.20% (1–3 days), 2.12% (>3 days); P=0.76 for difference

This systematic review pooled 14 studies of 7,981 patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull-base surgery with a single prophylactic antibiotic. Postoperative meningitis occurred in 1.38% overall (95% CI 0.92 to 2.08%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 65.8%).

By duration, incidence was 1.24% with ultra-short prophylaxis (one day or less), 1.20% with one to three days and 2.12% with more than three days. The difference was not significant, and duration was not associated with meningitis on meta-regression. A higher proportion of intraoperative CSF leak was associated with more meningitis.

Prolonged antibiotics after skull-base surgery, often continued while nasal packing stays in, are common practice and a stewardship target. These data, though observational and study-level, give no sign that longer courses protect. Risk appears to sit with the operation, particularly CSF leak, not with how long the antibiotic runs.

  • Consider limiting prophylaxis after endonasal skull-base surgery to about 24 hours.
  • Longer courses showed no lower meningitis rate in pooled data.
  • Focus surveillance on patients with intraoperative CSF leak, where meningitis was more common.
  • Agree a written duration with the neurosurgical team rather than continuing until packing is removed.

Why it matters

It removes the main argument for multi-day prophylaxis in a procedure where it is routinely prolonged.

Don't overread it

These are pooled observational cohorts with high heterogeneity, not a randomised comparison of durations.

The statistics, in plain English

The overlapping confidence intervals and a subgroup P value of 0.76 mean the duration groups could not be told apart. I² of 65.8% means the studies differed considerably, so the pooled rate is an average across varied practice.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

tbrespiratoryinfvaccinesamr

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for infectious diseases, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app