DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 3 November 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 05

Infant nirsevimab was linked to fewer RSV admissions into a second season

Nirsevimab's first-season benefit is well established; the second-season reduction is an interesting, unreplicated signal.

Design
Commentary on a population-based observational programme evaluation
Population
Infants in Galicia, Spain, offered universal nirsevimab
Primary outcome
RSV lower respiratory tract infection hospitalisation
Effect
First season −85.9% (95% CI 80.2–90.0); second season −55.3% (22.5–74.3)

A Lancet Infectious Diseases commentary revisits the Galician NIRSE-GAL programme, in which nirsevimab was offered to all infants. In the first season, RSV lower respiratory tract infection admissions fell by 85.9% (95% CI 80.2–90.0). Into the second season, a reduction of 55.3% (22.5–74.3) persisted, alongside fewer repeat severe episodes.

There was no sign of enhanced disease or of severe illness simply shifting to older ages — a reassurance worth having, since nirsevimab does not give sterilising immunity.

Why protection might outlast the antibody is not known. The authors propose that sparing a developing lung from severe infection in the first year, and protecting the most susceptible infants, may matter. They are clear the second-season finding is unreplicated and rests on an unproven assumption about who would have been admitted.

  • Universal infant nirsevimab was associated with about 86% fewer first-season RSV admissions
  • A second-season reduction of about 55% was seen but has not been replicated
  • There was no evidence of enhanced disease after prophylaxis
  • Do not promise parents protection beyond the first season on this evidence

Why it matters

It removes the fear that passive protection in infancy merely postpones severe RSV to the next winter.

Don't overread it

The second-season effect comes from one observational programme and has not been replicated.

The statistics, in plain English

The second-season confidence interval, 22.5% to 74.3%, is wide: the true reduction could be modest or large. The first-season interval is narrow, so that estimate is much firmer.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

vaccinesrespiratoryinfamrtbhiv

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for infectious diseases, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app