DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 28 September 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 05

No nursing add-on beat good standard care for ICU delirium in a network meta-analysis

For delirium, deliver the standard prevention bundle reliably rather than adding unproven single interventions.

Design
Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials
Population
21 trials of ICU patients with delirium
Primary outcome
Delirium cure rate, ICDSC and APACHE II scores
Effect
No intervention significantly better than regular nursing (all P > 0.05)

This Bayesian network meta-analysis included 21 randomised trials of nursing interventions for delirium in intensive care: auricular acupressure, music therapy, cognitive exercise, longer visiting hours and targeted nursing, each compared with regular nursing care.

None was significantly better than regular nursing for delirium resolution, delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) scores or APACHE II scores. Acupressure and music ranked highest, but rankings describe relative order, not proven benefit, and the authors say so.

For physicians on wards and in high-dependency units, the lesson is to get the basics right rather than chase add-ons. The established bundle (reorientation, sleep, mobilisation, hearing and vision aids, avoiding deliriogenic drugs, family presence) has stronger evidence than any single intervention here.

  • No single nursing add-on was proven better than good standard care for ICU delirium.
  • Keep glasses and hearing aids on, reorient often, and protect night-time sleep.
  • Review and reduce benzodiazepines, anticholinergics and opioids where possible.
  • Longer family visiting is cheap and was promising, though not proven here.

Why it matters

It stops attention drifting from the bundle that works to add-ons that have not shown benefit.

Don't overread it

A top ranking in a network meta-analysis is not evidence of efficacy when no comparison was significant.

The statistics, in plain English

SUCRA rankings order treatments by the probability of being best but do not show that any is actually better than control; here, none was statistically superior. Many included trials were small, which limits precision.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

evidencediagnosistransitions

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for internal medicine, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app