- Design
- Process evaluation of a national quality improvement collaborative
- Population
- 157 Canadian hospitals (91 academic, 64 community, 2 paediatric), 2021 to 2026
- Primary outcome
- Engagement, data submission and types of intervention used
- Effect
- 91 hospitals (58%) submitted testing data; 78% of projects used multimodal interventions
Choosing Wisely Canada's Using Labs Wisely collaborative has grown since 2021 to 157 hospitals across six provinces, 58% academic and 41% community. This process evaluation describes how the programme works rather than its effect on outcomes.
The collaborative benchmarks eight low-value inpatient tests, adjusted for bed-days: coagulation profiles, AST, urea, CK-MB, serum or red cell folate, vitamin B12, ESR and urine cultures. Urea, AST and coagulation testing were the ones hospitals most often targeted. Most improvement projects (78%) used several levers together: education, audit and feedback, changes to order sets, and ordering rules.
For a ward physician, the list is a ready-made audit. Each of these tests is commonly ordered by habit, on admission bundles or as daily repeats, when it will not change management. The usual harms are downstream: incidental results that prompt further tests, iatrogenic anaemia from repeated phlebotomy, and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria from unprompted urine cultures.
- Remove routine coagulation screens from admission order sets unless the patient is anticoagulated, bleeding or due a procedure.
- Order AST only when a liver question is being asked; ALT alone often answers a screening question.
- Stop daily urea and electrolytes in stable patients and set an explicit review date instead.
- Send a urine culture only for urinary symptoms or sepsis without a source, not as part of an admission screen.
- Drop CK-MB from chest pain panels; troponin has replaced it for detecting myocardial injury.
Why it matters
Most unnecessary inpatient testing is set by default order sets, which one team can change.
Don't overread it
This evaluation reports participation and methods, not whether patient outcomes or costs improved.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for internal medicine, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free