- Design
- Quasi-cluster randomised trial of an electronic decision-support alert
- Population
- 400 outpatients ≥6 months after PE with symptoms or abnormal tests, under 73 physicians
- Primary outcome
- Echocardiographic screening within 90 days
- Effect
- 32.5% vs 17.5% (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.58–3.15); pulmonary hypertension found 10.5% vs 5.0%
CTEPH-DETECT was a quasi-cluster randomised trial in outpatients at least six months after a pulmonary embolism, with persistent or new symptoms or unexplained abnormal tests, and no echocardiogram in the previous six months. 73 physicians caring for 400 such patients were assigned to receive an electronic alert recommending an echocardiogram, or no alert.
Echocardiography within 90 days was ordered for 32.5% with the alert against 17.5% without (adjusted OR 2.23). New pulmonary hypertension on echo was found in 10.5% against 5.0%. No patient received a formal diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in either group during the study.
The value of the trial is in showing how often a symptomatic patient after PE goes unscreened. Even with the alert, two-thirds did not have an echo. Patient outcomes were not measured, and the absence of any new CTEPH diagnosis means it is not yet clear the extra scans changed anyone's course.
- Ask about breathlessness and exercise tolerance at every review from three months after a pulmonary embolism.
- Consider echocardiography for patients with persistent or new symptoms after PE, as current practice already recommends.
- Use a recall or flag in your own clinic system; without prompting, most eligible patients went unscreened.
- Refer suspected pulmonary hypertension after PE for ventilation-perfusion scanning, which is the screening test for CTEPH.
- Do not attribute persistent breathlessness after PE to deconditioning without excluding pulmonary hypertension.
Why it matters
It shows that symptomatic patients after PE are usually not screened unless someone is reminded.
Don't overread it
The trial measured scans ordered and pulmonary hypertension found, not whether patients did better.
The statistics, in plain English
An adjusted odds ratio of 2.23 (95% CI 1.58–3.15) means the alert roughly doubled the odds of an echo being ordered. Because physicians rather than patients were randomised and the design was 'quasi' randomised, the groups may differ in ways the analysis could not adjust for.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for internal medicine, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free