- Design
- Matched case-control study using claims and health check data
- Population
- 21,724 employees aged 18–74 with heatstroke and 65,172 matched controls, Japan
- Primary outcome
- Heatstroke by wet-bulb globe temperature and count of 11 conditions
- Effect
- At 33°C vs 25°C: OR 2.04 with 0 conditions, 2.66 with 4 conditions; RERI 0.65 (0.45–0.85)
A matched case-control study used a Japanese employee claims database linked to health check data, comparing 21,724 adults aged 18 to 74 with heatstroke against 65,172 age- and sex-matched controls. Exposure was the day's maximum wet-bulb globe temperature, which combines heat, humidity and radiant load. Condition burden was a simple count of 11 lifestyle, cardiometabolic and chronic conditions, with adjustment for heat-sensitive medicines.
Compared with a wet-bulb temperature of 25°C and no conditions, the odds of heatstroke at 33°C were 2.04 (95% CI 1.84–2.25) with no conditions and 2.66 (2.40–2.94) with four. The interaction held on both multiplicative and additive scales. After medication adjustment, smoking, liver dysfunction and obesity remained independently associated.
Heat warnings are built on weather thresholds, not on who is exposed. This study suggests the same hot day carries different risk for the outdoor worker with obesity, diabetes and fatty liver than for a healthy colleague. It applies directly to Indian practice, where many working-age patients with several conditions work outdoors through the pre-monsoon heat. It is observational, so it shows who is at higher risk, not that treating those conditions would lower it.
- Identify patients with several chronic conditions who work outdoors or in hot, poorly ventilated places.
- Give heat advice before summer to those patients: water, shade, breaks and early symptoms of heat illness.
- Review diuretics, anticholinergics and other heat-sensitive medicines before the hot season.
- Ask about occupation and heat exposure when recording a patient's multimorbidity.
Why it matters
Heat warnings treat everyone the same, and this shows multimorbid patients carry more of the risk.
Don't overread it
This was observational; it cannot show that controlling these conditions would prevent heatstroke.
The statistics, in plain English
An odds ratio of 2.66 means the odds of heatstroke were about 2.7 times those on a cooler day for a person with four conditions. The per-step interaction of 1.009 looks tiny, but it compounds across every degree and every added condition.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for internal medicine, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free