DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 5 October 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 05

Fluconazole did not help nephrogenic diabetes insipidus

Do not repurpose fluconazole for nephrogenic diabetes insipidus; a clinical study found no reduction in urine output despite preclinical promise.

Design
Open-label, non-randomised clinical intervention study
Population
Five adult men with AVPR2-related congenital arginine vasopressin resistance
Primary outcome
24-hour urine output and urinary concentrating ability
Effect
Median urine output change +0.8 L (range -3.6 to +5.7); urine osmolality -3 mOsm/kg; no concentrating improvement

Congenital arginine vasopressin resistance (formerly nephrogenic diabetes insipidus) causes massive urine output and dehydration risk, with no curative treatment. Preclinical work suggested the antifungal fluconazole could enhance aquaporin-2-mediated water transport, raising hope for repurposing.

In an open-label study, five adult men with AVPR2-related disease took fluconazole 400 mg daily for 14 days. The median change in 24-hour urine output was +0.8 litres (range -3.6 to +5.7), urine osmolality barely moved (-3 mOsm/kg), and concentrating ability on water deprivation did not improve.

This is a small, clean negative result: a mechanistically promising repurposing did not translate to patients. It is a useful corrective against off-label use on the strength of preclinical data, and a reminder that aquaporin-targeting for this disorder still lacks an effective option. The sample is tiny, but the direction is unambiguous.

  • Fluconazole was tested in congenital arginine vasopressin resistance on preclinical promise.
  • Urine output did not fall (median change +0.8 litres) over 14 days.
  • Urine concentrating ability on water deprivation did not improve.
  • Do not use fluconazole off-label for this disorder on preclinical grounds.
  • An effective therapy for this condition is still lacking.

Why it matters

It stops a preclinically hyped repurposing before it reaches off-label practice in a desperate disease.

Don't overread it

Very small, open-label study; it argues against benefit but cannot formally exclude a small effect in subgroups.

The statistics, in plain English

With only five patients the study is tiny, but the complete absence of any reduction in urine output or osmolality makes a clinically useful effect very unlikely.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

akiglomerularckd

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for nephrology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app