DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 7 October 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 05

Very mild stroke from large artery disease may do better on dual antiplatelets than alteplase, in an exploratory analysis

An exploratory ARAMIS subgroup hints that dual antiplatelets may suit very mild stroke from large artery disease; it is not yet a basis for practice.

Design
Post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomised trial (ARAMIS)
Population
478 patients with minor non-disabling stroke and vessel imaging
Primary outcome
Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0 to 1) at 90 days
Effect
NIHSS 0 to 3 with LAA: 97.3% vs 85.1%, adjusted OR 6.45 (0.68 to 60.81)

ARAMIS found dual antiplatelet therapy non-inferior to alteplase in minor non-disabling stroke (NIHSS 0 to 5). This post hoc analysis took 478 patients with vessel imaging and split them by severity (NIHSS 0 to 3 or 4 to 5) and by whether large artery atherosclerosis was the cause.

In NIHSS 0 to 3 with large artery disease, excellent 90-day outcome was 97.3% with dual antiplatelets and 85.1% with alteplase (adjusted OR 6.45, 0.68 to 60.81), reaching significance only in a weighted sensitivity analysis (OR 6.49, 1.54 to 27.39). Without large artery disease the gap was small. The interaction test was not significant, and bleeding was similar.

The authors call it hypothesis-generating, and it is. It does not change the main ARAMIS message, but it adds a reason to image the vessels early in minor stroke.

  • Image the intracranial and extracranial vessels early in minor stroke
  • Do not change thrombolysis decisions on this subgroup analysis
  • In non-disabling minor stroke, dual antiplatelet therapy is a reasonable alternative to alteplase, as in the main ARAMIS result
  • Large artery atherosclerosis may be the group where antiplatelets perform best, pending confirmation

Why it matters

It raises the idea that stroke mechanism, not just severity, could guide acute minor stroke treatment.

Don't overread it

This is a post hoc subgroup with no adjustment for multiple comparisons.

The statistics, in plain English

The confidence interval of 0.68 to 60.81 is extremely wide, showing how few events there were. A non-significant interaction test means the trial cannot show that the treatment effect truly differs between subgroups.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

dementiamsstroke

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for neurology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app