- Design
- Systematic review with individual-participant pooled analysis
- Population
- 272 people with germline genetic epilepsy undergoing resection or laser ablation
- Primary outcome
- Seizure freedom (Engel I) at last follow-up
- Effect
- Vascular 73.6%, GATORopathies 65.8%, channelopathies 30.0%, synaptopathies 22.2%
This pooled individual-patient analysis combined 224 published cases with 48 from institutional and paediatric consortium databases: 272 people with pathogenic germline variants, excluding tuberous sclerosis, who had resection or laser ablation. Median follow-up was 24 months.
Seizure freedom was achieved in 74% of vascular disorders, 66% of GATOR-pathway (mTOR-related) disorders and 58% of copy-number variants, but only 30% of channelopathies and 22% of synaptopathies. The low rates in channelopathies and synaptopathies held even when MRI showed a lesion, which most did.
In practice, a genetic diagnosis should not exclude surgery, and in GATOR-pathway epilepsy it may strengthen the case. In channelopathies and synaptopathies, a visible lesion is weaker reassurance than usual, and expectations need setting accordingly. The data are retrospective and drawn mostly from published reports, which favour successes.
- Do not exclude a patient from surgical evaluation because of a germline genetic diagnosis.
- Expect better surgical outcomes in GATOR-pathway and vascular genetic epilepsies.
- Set lower expectations in channelopathies and synaptopathies, even with an MRI lesion.
- Include genetic results in the epilepsy surgery multidisciplinary discussion.
Why it matters
It turns a genetic result from a reason to avoid surgery into a guide to who benefits.
Don't overread it
Largely retrospective and literature-based; publication bias likely inflates success rates.
The statistics, in plain English
Odds ratios of 0.22 and 0.23 for channelopathies and synaptopathies mean roughly four-fold lower odds of seizure freedom than other groups. Some groups are small (19 vascular cases), so their estimates are imprecise. Published case reports tend to over-represent good outcomes.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for neurology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free