DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 2 September 2026 edition

Regulatory · 04 of 05

ACOG has published a clinical practice guideline on obstetric cerclage

ACOG has issued a GRADE-based clinical practice guideline on obstetric cerclage covering indications, technique, alternatives and management across cervical insufficiency, prior obstetric history and cervical shortening.

No new drug approvals or safety communications affecting obstetric or gynaecological practice today.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has published a clinical practice guideline on obstetric cerclage, developed under an a priori protocol by three maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists, with a librarian-led search across Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed and MEDLINE, and a modified GRADE evidence-to-decision framework.

It covers indications, surgical technique, alternatives and management, across the three routes into a cerclage decision: cervical insufficiency, prior obstetric history, and cervical shortening found on surveillance. Those three are frequently conflated in practice and have quite different evidence behind them — history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated and examination-indicated cerclage are distinct interventions with distinct trial bases.

The methodology description is worth noting for what it commits to. An a priori protocol and a stated evidence-to-decision framework mean a reader can see which recommendations rest on trials and which on committee judgement, which is the difference between a guideline you can argue with and one you can only follow.

  • No new approvals, recalls or safety communications for obstetrics today
  • Covers indications, technique, alternatives and ongoing management
  • Separates cervical insufficiency, obstetric history and cervical shortening
  • Modified GRADE framework, so recommendation strength is visible
  • The three cerclage indications have genuinely different evidence bases

The statistics, in plain English

An evidence-to-decision framework makes explicit how a recommendation was derived — the certainty of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, and the values assumed. That transparency is what allows a clinician who weighs those values differently to depart from the recommendation deliberately rather than by oversight.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

maternalfetalcontraceptionpretermlabour

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for obstetrics & gynaecology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app