DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 25 October 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 06

Aspirin after preterm birth may help only when the placenta showed malperfusion

Worth reviewing placental pathology after a spontaneous preterm birth; this subgroup result is not yet a reason to prescribe aspirin for recurrence.

Design
Secondary analysis of a multicentre placebo-controlled RCT (APRIL)
Population
160 women with prior spontaneous preterm birth and available placental histology; 44 with malperfusion
Primary outcome
Recurrent preterm birth
Effect
With malperfusion: 4.2% vs 45.0%, RR 0.09 (0.01–0.43)

The Dutch APRIL trial found no overall benefit of low-dose aspirin for preventing recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. This secondary analysis looked back at placental histology from the earlier preterm birth, which was available for 160 of 387 participants.

In the 44 women whose previous placenta showed maternal vascular malperfusion, recurrent preterm birth occurred in 1 of 24 on aspirin against 9 of 20 on placebo (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01–0.43). In women without malperfusion the direction reversed, 29% versus 17% (RR 1.70, 0.87–3.56), though that difference was not significant.

The biology is plausible — aspirin acting on a vascular phenotype — but the numbers are tiny and placental histology was missing for most participants. Treat it as a reason to request and read placental pathology after a spontaneous preterm birth, not as a basis for prescribing.

  • After a spontaneous preterm birth, check whether placental histology was sent and what it showed.
  • Note any maternal vascular malperfusion in the notes for the next pregnancy's planning.
  • Do not start aspirin for recurrent preterm birth prevention on this subgroup result alone.
  • Aspirin given for pre-eclampsia risk remains governed by existing guidance, unaffected by this analysis.

Why it matters

It suggests spontaneous preterm birth is not one disease, and the placenta may identify who could benefit from aspirin.

Don't overread it

A post-hoc subgroup of 44 women from a trial that was neutral overall — hypothesis-generating only.

The statistics, in plain English

The relative risk of 0.09 looks dramatic, but it comes from 10 events in 44 women; the wide interval (0.01–0.43) shows how unstable that estimate is. Subgroup findings from a trial that was negative overall are often not reproduced.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

labourmaternalpretermfetal

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for obstetrics & gynaecology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app