DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 28 September 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 06

Adding a FAK inhibitor to KRAS G12C blockade doubled response in colorectal cancer, not significantly

An oral FAK inhibitor partner for KRAS G12C blockade showed a promising but unproven response signal; it remains investigational.

Design
Multicentre phase 1b/2 trial with open-label randomised phase 2 cohort
Population
51 patients with previously treated KRAS G12C metastatic colorectal cancer (China)
Primary outcome
Investigator-assessed objective response rate
Effect
Randomised: 38.9% vs 16.7%; difference 22.2% (95% CI −7.7 to 49.1), one-sided p = 0.068

This Chinese phase 1b/2 study tested ifebemtinib, an oral focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitor, with the KRAS G12C inhibitor garsorasib in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer carrying KRAS G12C. After a single-arm phase (15 patients, response 46.7%), 36 patients were randomised to the combination or garsorasib alone.

Confirmed objective response was 38.9% with the combination against 16.7% with garsorasib alone (difference 22.2%, 95% CI −7.7 to 49.1; one-sided p = 0.068). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33% vs 28%, mainly diarrhoea; there were no treatment-related deaths.

KRAS G12C inhibitors alone work poorly in colorectal cancer because of feedback signalling, and current practice pairs them with an EGFR antibody. This is an alternative partner with a promising signal, but the numbers are too small to draw conclusions. Funders included InxMed and InventisBio as well as public research bodies.

  • Test for KRAS G12C in metastatic colorectal cancer; it opens targeted options.
  • KRAS G12C inhibitors are paired with a second agent in colorectal cancer; monotherapy responses are low.
  • Ifebemtinib plus garsorasib is investigational and not available outside trials.
  • Watch for diarrhoea, the main grade 3 toxicity of the combination.

Why it matters

It points to a possible all-oral combination for KRAS G12C colorectal cancer.

Don't overread it

This small phase 2 randomised comparison did not reach statistical significance.

The statistics, in plain English

With 18 patients per arm, a difference of 22 percentage points has a 95% CI from about −8 to +49, so it could be chance. Response rate is also a surrogate for survival.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

haemoncbreastprecisiononcgicancersupportivescreening

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for oncology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app