DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 11 October 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 05

REVERCE II closed early: sequencing regorafenib and anti-EGFR therapy remains unanswered

No change to sequencing; REVERCE II was too small to answer the question.

Design
Randomised phase 2 trial, closed early for poor accrual and funding
Population
22 patients with refractory RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Effect
Median 21.9 vs 13.3 months (regorafenib first vs anti-EGFR first), one-sided P=0.114

REVERCE II was a randomised phase 2 trial in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Patients received regorafenib followed by anti-EGFR therapy (with or without irinotecan), or the reverse order. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The trial closed early because of slow enrolment and lack of funding, with only 22 patients (12 and 10).

Sequential treatment was started in 33% (4 of 12) of the regorafenib-first arm and 80% (8 of 10) of the anti-EGFR-first arm. Median overall survival was 21.9 vs 13.3 months (one-sided P=0.114), which did not meet significance. Progression-free survival on the first treatment was 2.5 vs 5.6 months, and progression-free survival on the second was 3.7 vs 2.0 months. Sequential progression-free survival was 9.3 vs 9.6 months. No significant differences in adverse effects were seen.

The authors suggest regorafenib first may carry a survival benefit, but with 22 patients, and a minority completing the sequence in one arm, the result is a hypothesis and not a basis for changing practice.

  • Do not change the sequence of therapy on the basis of this trial.
  • Twenty-two patients cannot support conclusions on survival differences.
  • Only 4 of 12 patients in the regorafenib-first arm received the second therapy.
  • Anti-EGFR therapy remains an option in RAS wild-type disease per existing guidance.

Why it matters

Sequencing questions in refractory colorectal cancer are common and rarely have randomised answers.

Don't overread it

A trial closed early with 22 patients is underpowered and inconclusive.

The statistics, in plain English

A one-sided P of 0.114 for survival is not significant, and with 22 patients, large survival differences can arise by chance. Progression-free survival on first treatment favoured the other arm, which shows how mixed the signals were.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

breastgicancerscreeningprecisiononc

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for oncology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app