- Design
- Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, three arms
- Population
- 1,367 women with stage III or IV BRCA non-mutated epithelial ovarian cancer
- Primary outcome
- Progression-free survival (PD-L1 CPS 10 or higher, then intention to treat)
- Effect
- Hazard ratio 0.66 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.83) in CPS 10 or higher; 0.71 (0.61 to 0.84) overall
KEYLYNK-001 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial at 224 centres in 22 countries. It enrolled 1,367 women with stage III or IV epithelial ovarian, peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer without BRCA mutation, who had not received a PD-1 or PARP inhibitor. They were assigned 1:1:1 to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab followed by pembrolizumab plus olaparib maintenance, chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab followed by pembrolizumab alone, or placebo throughout; bevacizumab was allowed at the investigator's discretion.
At the final analysis (median follow-up 49.6 months), progression-free survival with pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus control had a hazard ratio of 0.66 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.83) in the PD-L1 CPS 10 or higher population and 0.71 (0.61 to 0.84) in the whole intention-to-treat population. Pembrolizumab alone was not better than control in the CPS 10 or higher population (0.95, 0.77 to 1.19). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66%, 56% and 51% of the three groups; serious ones in 24%, 21% and 9%. Four women (1%) in the combination group died of treatment-related events.
The abstract does not report overall survival, and progression-free survival is a surrogate. The trial was funded by the manufacturer and enrolled mostly White participants. It supports the idea that the combination may have potential but it does not establish a new standard, and it was not tested against the established PARP-inhibitor options available in practice.
- Progression-free survival hazard ratio for the combination was 0.71 overall and 0.66 in CPS 10 or higher.
- Pembrolizumab without olaparib did not improve progression-free survival in the PD-L1-high population.
- Serious treatment-related adverse events were 24% with the combination against 9% with chemotherapy alone.
- Overall survival was not reported in the abstract, so weigh benefit against toxicity cautiously.
Why it matters
It tests a combination aimed at a group, BRCA non-mutated disease, that has few maintenance options.
Don't overread it
Progression-free survival is a surrogate for survival, and the added toxicity was substantial.
The statistics, in plain English
A progression-free survival hazard ratio of 0.71 means a 29% lower rate of progression or death at any time. It does not say the women lived longer; that depends on overall survival, which was not reported.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for oncology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free