DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 19 October 2026 edition

Clinical update · 01 of 05

Tomosynthesis screening: fewer interval cancers, but not a significant difference at two years

Tomosynthesis was associated with about a quarter fewer interval cancers, but the two-year result was not statistically significant.

Design
Multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial
Population
About 99,000 women aged 50–70 in German screening; 98,755 screen-negative
Primary outcome
Invasive interval cancer rate over 24 months
Effect
14.2 vs 18.6 per 10,000; OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.55–1.06)

TOSYMA randomised about 99,000 women aged 50 to 70 in the German screening programme to digital breast tomosynthesis with synthesised two-dimensional images or standard digital mammography. Its first endpoint, already reported, showed higher detection with tomosynthesis. This second endpoint asked whether that translated into fewer cancers presenting between screens.

Over 24 months, invasive interval cancers occurred in 14.2 per 10,000 screen-negative women after tomosynthesis and 18.6 per 10,000 after mammography (OR 0.76), a difference that did not reach statistical significance. Within 12 months the difference was significant (4.5 versus 6.3 per 10,000; OR 0.71).

Fewer interval cancers is what would show that extra detection reflects meaningful cancers rather than overdiagnosis. The direction is encouraging, but the primary result is not conclusive. Tomosynthesis costs more and is less widely available, including in India, where coverage of any organised mammographic screening is limited.

  • Regard tomosynthesis as a reasonable screening option where available, not yet as a proven reduction in interval cancer.
  • Investigate new breast symptoms promptly regardless of a recent normal screen.
  • Keep women in their screening programme whichever modality is offered locally.
  • Expect further follow-up and pooled trial data before screening policies change.

Why it matters

Interval cancer is the test of whether extra detection in screening is worth having.

Don't overread it

The primary endpoint was not statistically significant.

The statistics, in plain English

An odds ratio of 0.76 points to fewer interval cancers, but the interval of 0.55 to 1.06 crosses 1.0, so the trial cannot exclude no difference. The significant 12-month result is a secondary outcome and carries less weight.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

breastscreeninglungimmunooncology

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for oncology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app