DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 21 October 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 05

Entinostat plus exemestane: longer median survival, but not statistically significant

Entinostat plus exemestane did not significantly improve overall survival; it does not change the post-endocrine sequence.

Design
Phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled; long-term OS analysis
Population
354 patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer after endocrine failure
Primary outcome
Overall survival (secondary analysis)
Effect
Median 38.6 vs 29.2 months; HR 0.83 (0.62–1.10), P = 0.18

Long-term follow-up of a Chinese phase 3 trial, published in Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, reports overall survival for 354 patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after endocrine therapy failure, randomised 2:1 to entinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, or placebo, each with exemestane.

At a median 31.8 months, median overall survival was 38.6 versus 29.2 months (HR 0.83, 0.62–1.10; P = 0.18). Time to chemotherapy and chemotherapy-free survival were longer with entinostat. Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 65.5%. Analyses adjusting for later therapies and per-protocol analyses favoured entinostat more strongly.

The earlier progression-free survival benefit has not been shown to translate into a significant survival gain. Adjusted and per-protocol analyses are hypothesis-generating; the intention-to-treat result is the one to rely on.

In a landscape where CDK4/6 inhibitors are standard, the place of entinostat is uncertain.

  • Rely on the intention-to-treat survival result, which was not significant
  • Treat analyses adjusted for later therapies as hypothesis-generating
  • Weigh the 65.5% rate of grade 3 or worse adverse events against an unproven survival gain

Why it matters

A progression-free survival gain did not carry through to a proven survival benefit.

Don't overread it

Adjusted and per-protocol survival gains cannot substitute for the non-significant primary comparison.

The statistics, in plain English

An HR of 0.83 with an interval from 0.62 to 1.10 fits anything from a 38% reduction to a 10% increase in death rate, so the trial cannot confirm a survival benefit.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

haemoncsupportivebreastgicancerprecisiononc

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for oncology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app