- Design
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of four observational studies
- Population
- 110 patients with cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, mean LVEF 24%
- Primary outcome
- Change in LVEF and LV volumes after CRT
- Effect
- LVEF +9.95 points (7.79 to 12.11); LVESV −39.2 mL
This meta-analysis pooled four studies of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients whose heart failure followed cancer treatment, mostly breast cancer and haematological malignancy.
Ejection fraction and ventricular volumes improved to a degree similar to other non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies.
The data are small and observational. They support applying standard device criteria to cancer survivors, with oncology input on prognosis.
- Most patients had survived breast cancer, lymphoma or leukaemia.
- Ejection fraction rose about 10 points over about nine months.
- The response matched CRT in other non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies.
- Cancer prognosis and competing risks should shape the decision.
Why it matters
Survivors of breast cancer and lymphoma with anthracycline cardiomyopathy may be under-referred for device therapy.
Don't overread it
Four small mostly retrospective studies measured imaging, not survival.
The statistics, in plain English
The intervals are narrow but come from 110 non-randomised patients, so those chosen for CRT may already have been healthier.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for oncology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free