DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 28 October 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 04

Tomosynthesis screening: fewer interval cancers, but not significantly

Tomosynthesis may reduce interval breast cancers, but the primary result was not significant; keep investigating symptoms between screens.

Design
Multicentre open-label randomised superiority trial
Population
About 98,700 screen-negative women aged 50–70 in Germany
Primary outcome
Invasive interval cancer rate over 24 months
Effect
14.2 vs 18.6 per 10,000; OR 0.76 (0.55–1.06)

TOSYMA randomised women aged 50 to 70 at 17 German screening sites to digital breast tomosynthesis with synthesised 2D images or to standard digital mammography. Its first result, a higher cancer detection rate with tomosynthesis, was reported earlier. This analysis followed screen-negative women for 24 months.

Invasive interval cancers occurred in 14.2 per 10,000 after tomosynthesis and 18.6 per 10,000 after digital mammography (adjusted OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55–1.06), which did not reach significance. In the first 12 months the difference was significant (OR 0.71, 0.52–0.97), but that was a secondary outcome.

Interval cancers are a better marker of screening benefit than detection rate alone, because extra detection can include overdiagnosis. The direction favours tomosynthesis, but the primary result is not conclusive and screening programmes have to weigh cost and reading time.

  • Treat tomosynthesis as possibly reducing interval cancers, not proven to on this primary endpoint.
  • Continue to investigate new breast symptoms between screens regardless of screening modality.
  • Advise women that a negative screen does not exclude cancer appearing before the next round.
  • Follow national screening programme policy on modality.

Why it matters

Higher detection only matters if it prevents the cancers that surface between screens.

Don't overread it

The primary endpoint did not reach significance; the 12-month finding is secondary.

The statistics, in plain English

An OR of 0.76 points to about a quarter fewer interval cancers, but the interval 0.55–1.06 crosses 1.0, so chance cannot be excluded. The significant 12-month result is a secondary outcome and weaker evidence.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

gucancersupportivebreastscreening

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for oncology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app