- Design
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 comparative studies
- Population
- 968 patients undergoing robotic or conventional THA
- Primary outcome
- Leg-length discrepancy, cup orientation, early hip scores
- Effect
- LLD MD -2.02 mm (-3.46 to -0.58); Harris Hip Score MD 2.96 (1.12 to 4.80)
This meta-analysis pooled seven comparative studies (968 patients), mostly nonrandomised, of robot-assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty.
Robotic surgery was associated with a smaller leg-length discrepancy (mean difference -2.02 mm, 95% CI -3.46 to -0.58), slightly lower cup anteversion, and no difference in inclination. Early scores were higher: Harris Hip Score by 2.96 points, Oxford Hip Score by 2.61 and Forgotten Joint Score by 14.68.
A 2 mm difference in leg length is unlikely to be felt by most patients, and the Harris and Oxford differences fall below commonly quoted thresholds for a noticeable change. The Forgotten Joint Score difference is larger but heterogeneous. With few studies and mostly nonrandomised designs, the case for robotic THA on outcomes alone remains unproven.
- Robotic THA gave modestly better leg-length restoration, about 2 mm
- Early functional score gains were small and mostly below noticeable thresholds
- Evidence is mainly nonrandomised; weigh cost and theatre time accordingly
- Careful templating and intraoperative checks remain the standard for leg length without a robot
Why it matters
It gives numbers to weigh against the cost of robotic systems now spreading in Indian private hospitals.
Don't overread it
Seven mainly nonrandomised studies with marked heterogeneity cannot show that robotics improves function.
The statistics, in plain English
A mean difference of about 3 points on the Harris Hip Score is statistically significant but smaller than the change most patients notice. Heterogeneity means the studies gave inconsistent results.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for orthopaedics, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free