DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 16 September 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 07

Two hearing aids gave more benefit than one, by a margin that may not matter to patients

Recommend two hearing aids for symmetrical age-related loss, but reassure patients who can manage only one that they will still benefit substantially.

Design
Single-blinded, parallel-group randomised trial, 2 US centres
Population
275 adults aged 50+ with age-related hearing loss, new to hearing aids
Primary outcome
APHAB global benefit at 3 months
Effect
19.7 vs 14.4 points; difference 5.3 (95% CI 1.8-8.8) favouring bilateral

This single-blinded randomised trial at two US university audiology services allocated 275 adults aged 50 or older with age-related hearing loss and little prior hearing aid use to bilateral or unilateral receiver-in-the-canal aids.

At three months, self-reported benefit on the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was 14.4 points with one aid and 19.7 with two, a difference of 5.3 points (95% CI 1.8-8.8). Both groups improved meaningfully.

Bilateral fitting is routine but has had little randomised support, and the second aid roughly doubles cost. The trial confirms a small extra benefit.

The authors themselves say it is unclear whether the difference is clinically meaningful. For a patient who can afford or tolerate only one aid, a single aid still delivers most of the benefit.

  • Offer bilateral aids as the default for symmetrical age-related hearing loss where affordable.
  • Where cost is a barrier, tell patients one aid still gives substantial benefit.
  • Start with one aid rather than none if that is what the patient will accept.
  • Review at three months; the benefit measured here was early.

Why it matters

Cost is the main barrier to hearing aid uptake, and most of the benefit comes from the first aid.

Don't overread it

The extra benefit was self-reported at three months and may fall below the threshold patients notice.

The statistics, in plain English

A 5.3-point difference is statistically clear because the confidence interval excludes zero, but clinical meaningfulness depends on whether individuals notice it. Both groups improved by far more than the gap between them.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

otologyheadneckonclaryngologypaedentvestibular

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for ent & head and neck surgery, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app