DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 2 September 2026 edition

Regulatory · 02 of 06

An international consensus definition for neonatal encephalopathy

An international Delphi has agreed a consensus definition of neonatal encephalopathy that separates the observed syndrome from any claim about its cause, which the interchangeable use of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy had blurred.

No new drug approvals or safety communications affecting paediatrics today. The standards development that matters is a consensus definition of neonatal encephalopathy, reached by international real-time Delphi.

The problem it addresses is real and long-standing: neonatal encephalopathy, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy and perinatal asphyxia have been used interchangeably across clinical trials and communication, which conflates a syndrome with one of its causes. That makes evidence synthesis harder than the underlying biology warrants, and makes conversations with parents less precise than they should be.

The process drew 235 complete and 143 partial responses from 52 countries, 20% from low- and middle-income settings, with 6% representing parents and caregivers, followed by three consensus meetings. The agreed primary domain defines neonatal encephalopathy as a heterogeneous clinical condition of abnormal or impaired brain function with multiple potential causes, presenting with altered consciousness and possibly seizures, abnormal reflexes, altered tone, posture or movement, or an abnormal brain-related breathing pattern.

The useful discipline is the separation: encephalopathy is what you observe, hypoxic-ischaemic is a claim about why. Recording the first without asserting the second is more accurate and, in a condition with medicolegal weight, more defensible.

  • No new approvals or safety communications for paediatrics today
  • Neonatal encephalopathy is the syndrome; hypoxic-ischaemic is one aetiology
  • Definition organised into primary, secondary and tertiary domains
  • Parents and caregivers were included in the consensus, which is uncommon
  • Adopt the terminology in notes and discharge summaries before trials adopt it

The statistics, in plain English

A Delphi process produces agreement, not evidence — its validity rests on who was asked and whether disagreement was surfaced rather than averaged away. Two features strengthen this one: participation from 52 countries with a fifth from low- and middle-income settings, and the inclusion of families, whose stake in the terminology is direct.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

paedresppaedinfectneonatalgrowth

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for paediatrics, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app