- Design
- Nine-year follow-up of a single-centre randomised trial
- Population
- 29 of 50 children treated for zone II ROP
- Primary outcome
- Refraction, acuity, ocular structure and function
- Effect
- Spherical equivalent −1.22 vs −1.90 D (p = 0.65); BCVA 0.15 vs 0.21 logMAR
In 2014, a single-centre trial randomised 50 infants with zone II, stage 2 or 3 retinopathy of prematurity with plus disease to bilateral laser or intravitreal ranibizumab. At nine years, 29 children were reassessed (10 laser, 19 ranibizumab).
Spherical equivalent (−1.22 vs −1.90 D) and best-corrected acuity (0.15 vs 0.21 logMAR) did not differ significantly. The ranibizumab group had thinner lenses, steeper corneas and a thinner central retina, and some electroretinogram differences.
With unequal loss to follow-up and very small numbers, the authors call the findings exploratory. They do not favour either treatment on long-term grounds, but they add to the case for long follow-up of children given anti-VEGF for ROP.
- Children treated for ROP with either laser or anti-VEGF need long-term eye follow-up.
- Visual acuity and refraction at school age were broadly similar between treatments here.
- Structural differences after ranibizumab are of uncertain clinical meaning.
- Treatment choice should still rest on short-term efficacy and local expertise.
Why it matters
Anti-VEGF use for ROP has grown faster than the evidence on what it does to the developing eye.
Don't overread it
With 29 children and differential loss to follow-up, this cannot show one treatment is better long term.
The statistics, in plain English
The confidence interval for the refraction difference runs from −2.26 to 3.62 D, which is wide enough to include clinically important differences in either direction.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for paediatrics, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free